Thursday, October 29, 2026

63° Washington D.C. Clear sky · high 73° low 50°

Us Global Networks

63° Washington D.C. Clear sky · high 73° low 50°

U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s Team Admits Error in Case Involving Former FBI Officials

In a surprising turn of events, U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office has admitted to a significant error in its prosecution of two former FBI officials, Nikki Floris and Bradley Benavides. Testimony from Special Agent…

Share:

In a surprising turn of events, U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office has admitted to a significant error in its prosecution of two former FBI officials, Nikki Floris and Bradley Benavides. Testimony from Special Agent Ryan Witt revealed that during a phone call, a Pirro aide openly acknowledged the mistake, stating, “This is our f—up.” This admission comes amidst a politically charged case involving allegations that both officials provided false statements to Congress regarding their knowledge of an investigation into Hunter Biden’s laptop.

The case took a dramatic twist last week when Floris and Benavides were charged, but the details surrounding their testimonies became murky. Witt testified that a congressional staffer who was supposed to corroborate the officials’ statements was only present for Benavides’ testimony, not Floris’. This discrepancy raises questions about the integrity of the accusations leveled against them.

During the preliminary hearing, Witt revealed that he was part of a call with the congressional staffer, Pirro aide Carlton Davis, and Pirro herself. The audio of this conversation was later shared with Benavides’ attorney, Ron Safer, who highlighted Davis’s acknowledgment of the prosecution’s blunder in court.

Following the revelation, federal prosecutors filed a superseding complaint that was not signed by any law enforcement officer or judge, which led to its dismissal by Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui. The judge expressed skepticism over the prosecution’s tactics, indicating that the case may be perceived as politically motivated rather than strictly legal.

Defense attorneys argued that the case had been tainted by political influence, emphasizing that the prosecution’s errors could undermine the fairness of the judicial process. The judge is expected to issue a written ruling regarding the case soon, as the implications of this acknowledgment could resonate throughout the ongoing investigation.

Photo credit: Jasper Colt